Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Darkscribes Community

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A question for all non-Note focused #ActivityPub developers and thinkers:

A question for all non-Note focused #ActivityPub developers and thinkers:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
activitypub
18 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
    linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    A question for all non-Note focused #ActivityPub developers and thinkers:

    Should we ever think of a way how to embed ActivityPub objects into others (in the content)? E.g. embedding a Question object within a long Article?

    @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan

    Feel free to tag more people in replies!

    evan@cosocial.caE liaizon@social.wake.stL smallcircles@social.coopS 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • linos@graz.socialL [email protected]

      A question for all non-Note focused #ActivityPub developers and thinkers:

      Should we ever think of a way how to embed ActivityPub objects into others (in the content)? E.g. embedding a Question object within a long Article?

      @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan

      Feel free to tag more people in replies!

      evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
      evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles Ever? Yes. Now? It's not my first priority. Too much else to do!

      julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • evan@cosocial.caE [email protected]

        @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles Ever? Yes. Now? It's not my first priority. Too much else to do!

        julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        [email protected] would be interested in exploring this at a later date, yes.

        Right now everything except polls are shoved into attachment which is ok. Not ideal.

        [email protected]

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
          evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @julian @linos not OK with me.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • linos@graz.socialL [email protected]

            A question for all non-Note focused #ActivityPub developers and thinkers:

            Should we ever think of a way how to embed ActivityPub objects into others (in the content)? E.g. embedding a Question object within a long Article?

            @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan

            Feel free to tag more people in replies!

            liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
            liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan this makes me think what happens when you Quote post (using the newly defined mastodon way) a video from @peertube or a book review from @bookwyrm, isn't this already a way of embeding into a different context?

            liaizon@social.wake.stL silverpill@mitra.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • liaizon@social.wake.stL [email protected]

              @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan this makes me think what happens when you Quote post (using the newly defined mastodon way) a video from @peertube or a book review from @bookwyrm, isn't this already a way of embeding into a different context?

              liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
              liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan @peertube @bookwyrm and additionally this makes me think: you should be able to reference (quote post) within a video object or quote an external video within an AP event

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • liaizon@social.wake.stL [email protected]

                @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan this makes me think what happens when you Quote post (using the newly defined mastodon way) a video from @peertube or a book review from @bookwyrm, isn't this already a way of embeding into a different context?

                silverpill@mitra.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                silverpill@mitra.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @liaizon @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan @peertube @bookwyrm Mastodon can't do this but FEP-e232 implementations can embed multiple objects. I'll try to make two links here

                Video

                Poll

                linos@graz.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • silverpill@mitra.socialS [email protected]

                  @liaizon @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan @peertube @bookwyrm Mastodon can't do this but FEP-e232 implementations can embed multiple objects. I'll try to make two links here

                  Video

                  Poll

                  linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                  linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @silverpill Linking is good, I wonder if this can be fine tuned, to say whether to embed that target object or not. I guess it's maybe kind of related to quoting. I'll have to check quote implementations.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • silverpill@mitra.socialS [email protected]

                    @liaizon @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan @peertube @bookwyrm Mastodon can't do this but FEP-e232 implementations can embed multiple objects. I'll try to make two links here

                    Video

                    Poll

                    linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @andypiper As you wrote a FEP for quoting, I really wonder what you think: isn't it that linking, embedding and quoting have quite something in common, so shouldn't their implementations be derivatives from each other?

                    @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @smallcircles @evan @peertube

                    smallcircles@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • linos@graz.socialL [email protected]

                      @andypiper As you wrote a FEP for quoting, I really wonder what you think: isn't it that linking, embedding and quoting have quite something in common, so shouldn't their implementations be derivatives from each other?

                      @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @smallcircles @evan @peertube

                      smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                      smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                      The issue I see with the Object Links FEP is that it boils down to: "If I know you adhere to the FEP, now I know to apply special logic to as:Link". May work well if we only do (micro)blogging. Is it a good general mechanism for a heterogeneous interoperable social web?

                      I am thinking more of: "Use existing open standards". Web annotations comes to mind. Specifically an annotation motivatedBy linking.

                      https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/#linking

                      smallcircles@social.coopS linos@graz.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • linos@graz.socialL [email protected]

                        A question for all non-Note focused #ActivityPub developers and thinkers:

                        Should we ever think of a way how to embed ActivityPub objects into others (in the content)? E.g. embedding a Question object within a long Article?

                        @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan

                        Feel free to tag more people in replies!

                        smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                        smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @linos

                        Btw, tangential.. some time ago I created this sketch to demonstrate a timeline having different types of AP objects on them. Not that that is the best UX, but because apparently everyone thinks in timeline widgets, so as a start πŸ™‚

                        And I just copied these notes to Social coding commons, which is themed to the less technical side of the social web, where people's needs are to be satisfied by the solutions we (co)create. By means of Social experience design. #SX

                        https://discuss.coding.social/t/the-composable-service-oriented-fediverse/663/2?u=aschrijver

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • smallcircles@social.coopS [email protected]

                          @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                          The issue I see with the Object Links FEP is that it boils down to: "If I know you adhere to the FEP, now I know to apply special logic to as:Link". May work well if we only do (micro)blogging. Is it a good general mechanism for a heterogeneous interoperable social web?

                          I am thinking more of: "Use existing open standards". Web annotations comes to mind. Specifically an annotation motivatedBy linking.

                          https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/#linking

                          smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                          smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                          Btw, see also this fediverse idea started by @helge

                          https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fediverse-ideas/issues/58

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • smallcircles@social.coopS [email protected]

                            @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                            The issue I see with the Object Links FEP is that it boils down to: "If I know you adhere to the FEP, now I know to apply special logic to as:Link". May work well if we only do (micro)blogging. Is it a good general mechanism for a heterogeneous interoperable social web?

                            I am thinking more of: "Use existing open standards". Web annotations comes to mind. Specifically an annotation motivatedBy linking.

                            https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/#linking

                            linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                            linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @smallcircles @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                            I wonder if Mastodon quotes aren't technically related more to embeds than "actual quotes". Cause what a Mastodon quote is doing is always referring to the whole quoted object (Note) without specifying where (and of course the consent, which is magnificent!). So maybe an embed could just be an extended Mastodon-quote where it is specified where it is in the content, e.g. via just using <embed> tags.

                            "actual quotes": being able to quote parts of something, putting it into context (where in content) and being referring to the whole origin source.

                            I see that we should continue this discussion on socialhub/the FEPs discussion places.

                            smallcircles@social.coopS renchap@oisaur.comR 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • linos@graz.socialL [email protected]

                              @smallcircles @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                              I wonder if Mastodon quotes aren't technically related more to embeds than "actual quotes". Cause what a Mastodon quote is doing is always referring to the whole quoted object (Note) without specifying where (and of course the consent, which is magnificent!). So maybe an embed could just be an extended Mastodon-quote where it is specified where it is in the content, e.g. via just using <embed> tags.

                              "actual quotes": being able to quote parts of something, putting it into context (where in content) and being referring to the whole origin source.

                              I see that we should continue this discussion on socialhub/the FEPs discussion places.

                              smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                              smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                              Yes agreed, the discussion should be started from a location where it federates to places where it is archived (forums), as the current conversation is ephemeral, and lost in history tomorrow, link-rotting πŸ™‚

                              linos@graz.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • smallcircles@social.coopS [email protected]

                                @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                                Yes agreed, the discussion should be started from a location where it federates to places where it is archived (forums), as the current conversation is ephemeral, and lost in history tomorrow, link-rotting πŸ™‚

                                linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                linos@graz.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @smallcircles I didn't expect this to go so far, when posting at first... πŸ™‚

                                smallcircles@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • linos@graz.socialL [email protected]

                                  @smallcircles I didn't expect this to go so far, when posting at first... πŸ™‚

                                  smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @linos it is a good thing, for sure πŸ™‚

                                  Had discussions the other day on how federating SocialHub had a bunch of negative side effects. Most notably an overall shift of dev discussions to microblogging where it only increases fragmentation of the discussion, and less cohesion in the community.

                                  Generally speaking "join the fediverse" is a bit meaningless, and we never really looked at the implications of federating. This is catching up in threadiverse efforts, but it is design after code.

                                  julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • linos@graz.socialL [email protected]

                                    @smallcircles @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                                    I wonder if Mastodon quotes aren't technically related more to embeds than "actual quotes". Cause what a Mastodon quote is doing is always referring to the whole quoted object (Note) without specifying where (and of course the consent, which is magnificent!). So maybe an embed could just be an extended Mastodon-quote where it is specified where it is in the content, e.g. via just using <embed> tags.

                                    "actual quotes": being able to quote parts of something, putting it into context (where in content) and being referring to the whole origin source.

                                    I see that we should continue this discussion on socialhub/the FEPs discussion places.

                                    renchap@oisaur.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    renchap@oisaur.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @linos We discussed "partial quotes" when working on quote posts, and decided not to explore this because you could easily change the text of what you are quoting to make it misleading but still attributed to the original author. Also it would probably have been good to have this discussion when we asked for comments, now we are deep into implementation and did not get much feedback when asked for it 😞

                                    @smallcircles @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • smallcircles@social.coopS [email protected]

                                      @linos it is a good thing, for sure πŸ™‚

                                      Had discussions the other day on how federating SocialHub had a bunch of negative side effects. Most notably an overall shift of dev discussions to microblogging where it only increases fragmentation of the discussion, and less cohesion in the community.

                                      Generally speaking "join the fediverse" is a bit meaningless, and we never really looked at the implications of federating. This is catching up in threadiverse efforts, but it is design after code.

                                      julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      [email protected] if you're not able to consume dev discussions on the fediverse and have to continually rely on people creating content on your platform then you need to raise that as an issue on your platform software.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups