Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Darkscribes Community

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.

Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
activitypubatprotocolatprotosocialweb
67 Posts 18 Posters 187 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • breathoflife@mastodon.socialB [email protected]

    @ikuturso @stefan @mastodonmigration @thisismissem

    and?

    if it enshittifies, people will simply migrate to other PDSes.

    and those PDSes will start looking at different relays

    the only thing i am concerned about is the appview thing, but i believe that deals with protocol content rather than any actual implementation (where the real nub of the control is)

    mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
    mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #54

    @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan @thisismissem

    The problem is a matter of scale. There is no way for 99% of users to "simply" move anywhere.

    breathoflife@mastodon.socialB thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • tuxwise@infosec.exchangeT [email protected]

      @thisismissem

      It is inappropriate to create a "statements" directory in the repository, with this as the only item in it, making it seem as if it was an official SWICG statement.

      Things like these are, at the very least, called a "draft" until they officially pass. You are doing your cause (to which I object anyway) no favor with this fishy activity.

      @nik

      thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
      thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #55

      @tuxwise @nik I had reason to believe it was fine, anyway, it's been taken down and replaced with this statement: https://github.com/swicg/general/blob/master/statements/2025-09-05-activitypub-and-atproto-discourse.md

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM [email protected]

        @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan @thisismissem

        The problem is a matter of scale. There is no way for 99% of users to "simply" move anywhere.

        breathoflife@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        breathoflife@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #56

        @mastodonmigration @ikuturso @stefan @thisismissem

        aye, there's the rub

        even on mastodon, migrating to another server is hard.

        you have to follow a 50 step process, create another account, then move all your stuff...

        it would be hella nice to have a one-click button that simply moves all your shit to another server.

        mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM [email protected]

          @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan @thisismissem

          The problem is a matter of scale. There is no way for 99% of users to "simply" move anywhere.

          thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
          thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #57

          @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan Blacksky already recently managed a mass migration away from Bluesky hosted PDS's for their community. Similar could happen if needed for other communities.

          mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM ikuturso@mastodon.socialI 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • breathoflife@mastodon.socialB [email protected]

            @mastodonmigration @ikuturso @stefan @thisismissem

            aye, there's the rub

            even on mastodon, migrating to another server is hard.

            you have to follow a 50 step process, create another account, then move all your stuff...

            it would be hella nice to have a one-click button that simply moves all your shit to another server.

            mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
            mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #58

            @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan @thisismissem

            Yes, that would be nice.

            thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT [email protected]

              Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.

              Yesterday at the Social Web CG meeting (the group that maintains the ActivityPub and related specifications), I proposed releasing a statement that counters the narrative that one of these protocols must win, when both protocols can co-exist and have a lot to learn from each other.

              The statement has been co-signed by various members of both Social Web CG, SocialCG, and the AT Protocol community.

              โ€œWe do not win by tearing each other down, which only emboldens and empowers those who do not want either protocol to succeed.โ€

              โ€œArguing between us only emboldens those that seek to derail and destroy efforts to build an open social web.โ€

              You can read the full statement here:
              https://writings.thisismissem.social/statement-on-discourse-about-activitypub-and-at-protocol/

              This was originally in the swicg/general repository, and you can learn about that here:
              https://github.com/swicg/general/blob/master/statements/2025-09-05-activitypub-and-atproto-discourse.md

              #activitypub #atprotocol #atproto #SocialWeb

              jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #59

              @thisismissem
              Ya the thing I would like to see more than infighting is fedi apps learning how to behave like PDSes and bluesky learning how to ingest AP

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ikuturso@mastodon.socialI [email protected]

                @stefan that visualization isn't particularly great at showing how (de)centralized it is though.

                Things are not to scale in it: Single user PDS is as much as 1/50th the area of a Bluesky Corporate PDS with almost 400,000 users.

                @mastodonmigration @thisismissem

                stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #60

                @ikuturso Yeah, neither one is perfect.

                The first site has an open issue on GitHub to include other parts of the ATProto stack, hopefully that will be added soon.

                https://github.com/ricci/distributed-social-networks/issues/1

                @mastodonmigration @thisismissem

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM [email protected]

                  @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan @thisismissem

                  Yes, that would be nice.

                  thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                  thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #61

                  @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan this exists in the ATmosphere โ€” https://tektite.cc/

                  and a demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SdmiCRYeZA

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT [email protected]

                    @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan Blacksky already recently managed a mass migration away from Bluesky hosted PDS's for their community. Similar could happen if needed for other communities.

                    mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #62

                    @thisismissem @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan

                    Yes, the Blacksky migration was impressive. It still did not change the overall percentage distribution numbers very much. It seems like proponents of AT Protocol should welcome criticism of too much dominance of Bluesky PBC and support more independent Blacksky type efforts.

                    Why, if Bluesky is actually serious about wanting AT Protocol to be decentralized, is there not more overt support for moving the numbers in a truly meaningful way.

                    thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM [email protected]

                      @thisismissem @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan

                      Yes, the Blacksky migration was impressive. It still did not change the overall percentage distribution numbers very much. It seems like proponents of AT Protocol should welcome criticism of too much dominance of Bluesky PBC and support more independent Blacksky type efforts.

                      Why, if Bluesky is actually serious about wanting AT Protocol to be decentralized, is there not more overt support for moving the numbers in a truly meaningful way.

                      thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #63

                      @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan there's also NorthSky in Canada that's building on Blacksky's work, and I'm sure there'll be something similar in the EU too

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT [email protected]

                        @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan Blacksky already recently managed a mass migration away from Bluesky hosted PDS's for their community. Similar could happen if needed for other communities.

                        ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #64

                        @thisismissem did they manage to get away from the did:plc dependency? Assuming not since there is no way to migrate those away from the PBC identity...

                        @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @stefan

                        thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • breathoflife@mastodon.socialB [email protected]

                          @mastodonmigration @ikuturso @stefan @thisismissem

                          aye, there's the rub

                          even on mastodon, migrating to another server is hard.

                          you have to follow a 50 step process, create another account, then move all your stuff...

                          it would be hella nice to have a one-click button that simply moves all your shit to another server.

                          julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #65

                          [email protected] I agree on the one hand, but simple and secure are hard to have together.

                          I'm not saying the Mastodon migration system can't be improved however...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ikuturso@mastodon.socialI [email protected]

                            @thisismissem did they manage to get away from the did:plc dependency? Assuming not since there is no way to migrate those away from the PBC identity...

                            @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @stefan

                            thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #66

                            @ikuturso @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @stefan there's plenty of DID methods that have been developed; There are some people using did:web, there's also did:webvh โ€” but there's definitely still more work to do in this space.

                            I think ActivityPub could theoretically adopt did:web or did:webvh as an alternative to webfinger.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups